"Mr. Speaker, these are the items the NDP has been asking for over the course of budget consultations: enhance the GIS for low-income seniors; employment insurance… We have delivered on all of these.If there is an election, let's not waste this opportunity to dump Phil.
There has been much talk about the coalition. Will the leader of the fourth party be forming a coalition should the result of an election be a minority government?"
Friday, March 25, 2011
Nonsense Non-sequitur
Once again Phil has embarrassed his constituents. In Parliament, he started asking a question about the economy (substantive policy!) and wound up asking a question about an NDP-Liberal-Bloc coalition (partisan idiocy…). Here's his full quote:
Wednesday, March 9, 2011
Tuesday, March 8, 2011
Don't Trust Phil's Claims on Land Claims
During the last election campaign, Phil promised to get something done about land claims. “Land claims are my number one issue”, he said. More recently Phil promised,
“We are shortly going to be sitting back down with our partners to work out that strategy,” he said. “A brand new negotiating strategy that will bring results.”What are those results? "Canada appears to be playing a cat and mouse waiting game with Six Nations land rights that could end up seeing more protests launched say people close to the stalled talks."
Obviously Phil is not living on this planet. He'll say anything to get votes, whether it's true or not!
Do Phil McColeman and his staff know how the Google machine works?
A basic Google search would have saved Phil the following embarassment...
Please send Google search tips to:
McColeman.P@parl.gc.ca
Please send Google search tips to:
McColeman.P@parl.gc.ca
Labels:
Brant,
Brantford,
Laurier-Brantford,
Phil McColeman
Monday, March 7, 2011
Who would make a better Conservative MP: Phil or the fire hydrant outside his office?
After reading frequent letters to the editor by Mr. Ben Ayles, one would think that anyone, including the yellow fire hydrant outside his Park Road North office, would make a better Member of Parliament than Phil McColeman.

McColeman in the Dark?
Brantford Expositor
Letter to the Editor by Benjamin Ayles
Posted 13 hours ago
Now Phil McColeman may be in the dark in Ottawa but what can you expect from a guy who once made his living pouring concrete. That's what we need in Ottawa, more plain talk and less thought, that will do just fine. Brant doesn't need St. Amand's smooth ways and fine talk, we need rough hands and someone who will let Mr. Harper make the decisions. So Mr. McColeman may be in the dark but Harper is bright enough for both of them.
Here are some other gems:
Defending Phil McColeman
Brantford Expositor
Letters to the Editor
In response to the letters sent responding to my earlier letter, "McColeman Not So Bad," I just have to say not to worry about Phil coming in a little under the mark MP wise because he has a leader who can answer questions for him.
Does anyone think Ignatieff would do that for Lloyd St. Amand? And of course I realize that we are Canadian, not American, but I'm with the Harperites who declare that unfettered capitalism combined with a Republican laissez-faire attitude is the right way to deal with Canada's economy. America has obeyed that most of the time and look at what a great country it is.
I support Harper's mirroring of ex-president Bush's policy, and I'm pleased Phil does, too.
Ben Ayles Oakland
And...
MP Phil McColeman is not so bad
The Paris Star
To the Editor:
I've been hearing a lot of complaining about MP Phil McColeman's inability to think and speak freely about local Brant issues, but I don't see that as a problem, really.
It doesn't take a whole lot to be a MP these days with all the technology we got, and with a leader like we have in Ottawa we're better off leaving decisions to the Prime Minister's office.
I like the direction Canada's going in, selling off Federal assets and corporations is the right thing to do, limiting access to abortions in the third world countries I also agree with, even the end of the long form census.
We should be modifying government by increasing its military and security presence, this is the strength of America, and I am pleased that our MP so wholeheartedly supports this direction as well. I don't mind that Harper speaks for McColeman since it is Harper that has come up with Conservative policy, not the MP's.
Thanks for knowing your limits Phil.
Ben Ayles,
Brantford, Ont.

McColeman in the Dark?
Brantford Expositor
Letter to the Editor by Benjamin Ayles
Posted 13 hours ago
Now Phil McColeman may be in the dark in Ottawa but what can you expect from a guy who once made his living pouring concrete. That's what we need in Ottawa, more plain talk and less thought, that will do just fine. Brant doesn't need St. Amand's smooth ways and fine talk, we need rough hands and someone who will let Mr. Harper make the decisions. So Mr. McColeman may be in the dark but Harper is bright enough for both of them.
Here are some other gems:
Defending Phil McColeman
Brantford Expositor
Letters to the Editor
In response to the letters sent responding to my earlier letter, "McColeman Not So Bad," I just have to say not to worry about Phil coming in a little under the mark MP wise because he has a leader who can answer questions for him.
Does anyone think Ignatieff would do that for Lloyd St. Amand? And of course I realize that we are Canadian, not American, but I'm with the Harperites who declare that unfettered capitalism combined with a Republican laissez-faire attitude is the right way to deal with Canada's economy. America has obeyed that most of the time and look at what a great country it is.
I support Harper's mirroring of ex-president Bush's policy, and I'm pleased Phil does, too.
Ben Ayles Oakland
And...
MP Phil McColeman is not so bad
The Paris Star
To the Editor:
I've been hearing a lot of complaining about MP Phil McColeman's inability to think and speak freely about local Brant issues, but I don't see that as a problem, really.
It doesn't take a whole lot to be a MP these days with all the technology we got, and with a leader like we have in Ottawa we're better off leaving decisions to the Prime Minister's office.
I like the direction Canada's going in, selling off Federal assets and corporations is the right thing to do, limiting access to abortions in the third world countries I also agree with, even the end of the long form census.
We should be modifying government by increasing its military and security presence, this is the strength of America, and I am pleased that our MP so wholeheartedly supports this direction as well. I don't mind that Harper speaks for McColeman since it is Harper that has come up with Conservative policy, not the MP's.
Thanks for knowing your limits Phil.
Ben Ayles,
Brantford, Ont.
Labels:
Brant,
Brantford,
Brantford Expositor,
Phil McColeman
Thursday, March 3, 2011
Phil McColeman: Cheapshot Artist
BREAKING NEWS: Phil abuses his position on the Public Safety Committee to take a cheap shot at a committee member who is not there...
He is then forced to apologize.
Typical Phil.
Phil even sucks at taking cheap shots.
He is then forced to apologize.
Typical Phil.
Phil even sucks at taking cheap shots.
Wednesday, March 2, 2011
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)