Phil McColeman's views on gender and sexual identity rights are clear: he has publicly stated that he opposes same-sex marriage, and was at one point associated with a coalition lobbying to make same-sex marriage illegal.
Phil McColeman's views on crime are also clear: he supports getting "tough on crime".
So how does Phil feel about hate crime against transgendered people? Answer: he doesn't oppose it.
A reader of this blog forwarded us an email exchange that he had with Phil McColeman regarding Bill C-389. That Bill would have strengthened the rights of transgendered individuals, including amending the Criminal Code to include the terms "Gender Identity" and "Gender Expression" to the hate crime offences. Getting tough on crime – Phil should love this, right? Wrong.
Phil McColeman opposed Bill C-389, arguing that "Gender Identity" and "Gender Expression" were not "clearly defined".
Well a lot of Criminal Code provisions are not clearly defined, but that doesn't stop the police and courts from enforcing them. For example, "sexual assault" is simply an assault that is "sexual". When the sexual assault provisions were enacted in 1983 nobody had any idea what they meant, but the lawyers and police figured it out anyway. Does Phil think that we should make rape legal just because "sexual assault" is not clearly defined? No way. Phil, as a "tough on crime" nut, understands how the Criminal Code works.
So according to Phil, men who wear a kilt have full protection of the law but men-cum-women who wear dresses don't. It's pathetic, but you know what there are still racist people out there too.
[for the entire text of the reader forwarded email, click here]
Thursday, April 28, 2011
Tuesday, April 26, 2011
Phil Shirks Responsibility… Again
Phil McColeman has insulted Brantford's hard-working city councillors by blaming them entirely for the cost overruns at the Gretzky Centre renovation.
As this blog has repeatedly stated, the cost overruns are almost entirely due to an unreasonably tight deadline on stimulus spending – a deadline implemented by the Conservative government. (For DumpPhil's past coverage of this issue, see "Phil's Pointless Promise", "Gretzky Centre Over Cost Because of Phil!", and "Conservative government costs Brantford millions in wastePHIL spending")
When will Phil man up and take responsibility??
As this blog has repeatedly stated, the cost overruns are almost entirely due to an unreasonably tight deadline on stimulus spending – a deadline implemented by the Conservative government. (For DumpPhil's past coverage of this issue, see "Phil's Pointless Promise", "Gretzky Centre Over Cost Because of Phil!", and "Conservative government costs Brantford millions in wastePHIL spending")
When will Phil man up and take responsibility??
Monday, April 25, 2011
Dump Phil Reaches 100!
This post marks the 100th entry since DumpPhil started reporting on the poor performance of Phil McColeman. It's quite an achievement. In a little over two years literally thousands of unique readers have visited the blog – on which we have spent $0. We are proud to have raised the level of political awareness and discourse in Brant.
Some of our greatest hits have included "Phil McColeman: Soft on Crime pt 1" and "pt 2", "Phil decorates the Canadian flag...", and "Phili Vanilli", each of which garnered hundreds or thousands of page loads.
During this final week before the election we'll have some really hard-hitting posts so check back often and keep leaving lots of comments. In the meantime, here's a rundown of our posts since we started:
Some of our greatest hits have included "Phil McColeman: Soft on Crime pt 1" and "pt 2", "Phil decorates the Canadian flag...", and "Phili Vanilli", each of which garnered hundreds or thousands of page loads.
During this final week before the election we'll have some really hard-hitting posts so check back often and keep leaving lots of comments. In the meantime, here's a rundown of our posts since we started:
Labels:
100th post,
celebration,
Dump Phil,
Member of Parliament,
Phil McColeman
Sunday, April 24, 2011
Phil Makes the List
Phil made the list of Conservative candidates who chickened out of an all-candidates debate!
Brantfordians should be proud. Not only do we have an MP who takes his job for granted, we also have a Prime Minister who is chicken-scared wholesale of talking to the public and the media.
Brantfordians should be proud. Not only do we have an MP who takes his job for granted, we also have a Prime Minister who is chicken-scared wholesale of talking to the public and the media.
Labels:
Conservative,
debate,
Election 41,
Phil McColeman,
transparency
Friday, April 22, 2011
Phil Does the Time Warp
The other day Phil was talking to his boss. He asked his boss to give him credit for doing a good job on a project. The boss responded that the project had been completed before Phil was even hired.
That's basically how the Chamber of Commerce all-candidates debate went down on Wednesday. Phil tried to take credit for funding a new water treatment facility in Ohsweken. Well we here at DumpPhil.ca were naturally suspicious of this claim, so we did a little digging and found this press release:
The funding was ANNOUNCED IN 2005, THREE MONTHS before Stephen Harper became Prime Minister, and a solid THREE YEARS before Phil even came into office. Lyin' Phil is tryin' to take credit for other people's work!
So unless Phil has a time machine in his office, there is no way that he or his government were responsible for the treatment plant.
The worst part is that Phil has been telling this lie for years, even though people called him on it long ago.
That's basically how the Chamber of Commerce all-candidates debate went down on Wednesday. Phil tried to take credit for funding a new water treatment facility in Ohsweken. Well we here at DumpPhil.ca were naturally suspicious of this claim, so we did a little digging and found this press release:
The funding was ANNOUNCED IN 2005, THREE MONTHS before Stephen Harper became Prime Minister, and a solid THREE YEARS before Phil even came into office. Lyin' Phil is tryin' to take credit for other people's work!
So unless Phil has a time machine in his office, there is no way that he or his government were responsible for the treatment plant.
The worst part is that Phil has been telling this lie for years, even though people called him on it long ago.
Thursday, April 21, 2011
Did Lazy Phil bother to read his party's platform this time?
Sadly this is a REAL question that needs to be asked:
"I HAVE NOT READ THE PLATFORM, IT'S SOOO NEW" - Phil McColeman, 2008 election debate
Phil also promised to e-mail the platform to someone who asked for a hard copy, not only did Lazy Phil not read his party's platform but he also does not know how to use a printer!

A reader spotted this image from yesterday's debate on the Brant News website, Phil with a giant debate binder full of notes in block letters:

Potential rebuttal from Lazy Phil: "I still haven't read the platform from the last election, so what do you expect?"
"I HAVE NOT READ THE PLATFORM, IT'S SOOO NEW" - Phil McColeman, 2008 election debate
Phil also promised to e-mail the platform to someone who asked for a hard copy, not only did Lazy Phil not read his party's platform but he also does not know how to use a printer!

A reader spotted this image from yesterday's debate on the Brant News website, Phil with a giant debate binder full of notes in block letters:
Potential rebuttal from Lazy Phil: "I still haven't read the platform from the last election, so what do you expect?"
Tuesday, April 19, 2011
Phil Has No Compassion
The Burford United Church held a different kind of "debate" last Sunday – one that "had an emphasis on compassion, creativity and a positive vision for Canada." What a wonderful idea in an age of increasingly negative campaigning.
Nora Feuten talked about how to mend the increasing gap between the rich and the poor.
Mark Laferriere talked about a community garden project that contributed to the food bank.
Lloyd St-Amand talked about land claims and duties owed to Aboriginal peoples by non-Aboriginals.
Phil McColeman didn't say anything because he didn't attend.
Nora Feuten talked about how to mend the increasing gap between the rich and the poor.
Mark Laferriere talked about a community garden project that contributed to the food bank.
Lloyd St-Amand talked about land claims and duties owed to Aboriginal peoples by non-Aboriginals.
Phil McColeman didn't say anything because he didn't attend.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



